TOP 100 BOOK SITES
| |||
|
| |||
| |||
|
| |||
| Poem of the week: Stone Poems by Douglas Skrief Skrief's nature poems sidestep the 'egotistical sublime' by allowing nature to speakSome poems enrol us as respectful admirers: others walk straight in through an open door in our minds and make themselves at home, admired no less, but also intimate friends. I felt this about Douglas Skrief's new book-length sequence, Stone Poems, and I have chosen a handful of separate poems from different sections to give you a glimpse of its pleasures.One way in which contemporary nature poets subvert the Wordsworthian "egotistical sublime" is by giving the natural world its own ego and voice. Ted Hughes and Alice Oswald employ this technique: the poet's thoughts "too deep for tears" are transferred to "the meanest flower" itself. Such dramatisation allows the writer unostentatiously to be present, while accessing unconventional or more powerful forms of utterance.The ancient boulder which talks to the poet in Stone Poems inhabits the south shore of Rainy Lake, in the US/Canadian border region of the Upper Midwest. "Court records," Skrief writes, "say that for over half a century my family has owned the Northern Minnesota bedrock on which the stone sits. The records do not mention the stone." Skrief has rectified this: the stone has become its own vivid historian, and the poet owns it in the sense that he has fully imagined it.Describing his educational background, Skrief lists Harvard and Oxford and "the sweat lodges of the Ojibway". So it seems he may owe his vision not only to the Romantic poets but to the animistic beliefs of this Native American people. His ease with a natural world infused with consciousness permeates all his observations.Skrief's imagination is nonetheless soundly scientific: all the elements in his universe cohere as a vast family-unit, whether they are gases, glaciers, coyote or human beings. Time often seems compressed, as if, as some physicists believe, events are simultaneous. The inevitability of evolution and change also comes across strongly in the later poems. When the boulder describes how its lichens are learning to break down "the latest particulates" emitted by nearby industrial workings, we are reminded of nature's prodigious adaptability. Whatever its terrors, progress is seen as inevitable, already implicit when the lichens "first saw a two-leggèd skip a flat stone".There are five sections in the sequence: Origins, Visitors, Awakenings, Words to the Word-Giver and Change. The boulder begins by recalling its originary "time amid stars" and "the crush/ before upheavals of deep horizons". It remembers how "A she-mastodon's single tusk dislodged iced lichens" and then evokes its human visitors: the priestess and the shaman, the fur-traders and "frost-bit men culling pine". In sections 3 and 4, the poet's personal relationship with the boulder is considered, and its own "character" emerges as it talks with the poet more intimately, and absorbs and reflects a more complex consciousness. The tone is authoritative, calm, amused, occasionally cranky or challenging, but un-judgmental. This stone values language, and sometimes addresses the human "Tongue of Creation" in a prayer-like chant. Whether rocks or pebbles, canticles, stories or haiku-like snapshots, the poems combine melody and harmony, clean outline and dense texture. Together they form the portrait of a man and a boulder; they are also the celebration and song of a particular region, its wildlife, its history, its native and immigrant cultures. But these Stone Poems are good travellers: they talk to any reader willingly, as if they shared our own profoundest memories, too. viiFor a moon, round an ash-wood fire,seven warriors counselled, contentthis point was theirs. One dragged his leg.Another, with oak-bark skin, picked at scarson his left shin. A boy, with the voiceof a brook, assented to every plan.They laughed. They called himThe-Sapling-No-Wind-Can-Tame.On their last day, they re-lashed spears,ochred faces and launched their craft.That evening a white-tailed coyote sniffed,then lifted his leg – his scent a mixof juniper berries and dead mice.(from Visitors)xviWords can't reattach a weasel paw left in a trapor replant spruce seedlings uprooted when stags rut.Moose shed their racks, and mice feast.If I cracked in half, part of you would die –your words careening like fireflies in a jar.Be a grizzly. Swat open the anthill.Release your needles to the squalls.Let storm-washed gravel fret your banksbefore frost sets the clay.(from Words to the Word-Giver)xiiiA shot. An elk avalanched, antlersbalanced even as it collapsed.I'll be here in the morning.It may not look like courage.(from Awakenings)iiThey flamed unwavering, long into the night.Not stars washed up on the far beach.Not lightning bolts persisting on singed retinas.Not campfires diminishing to coalsas old storytellers lost momentum. No.Streetlights. Houselights. Car lights. Approachingtill we could see up close how brashly they viedwith the splendid humility of the auroras. (from Change)xAnts build mounds with my castoffs.Bears splinter wild plum bows.Frost heaves fox holes as easilyas fire sears dry yarrow. Their dreams –all memory. You pile stones, yank upthe reed bed, mow the poplar volunteers.Promise if you ever choose to move me,Word-Giver, you'll start with a prayer.(from Change)Thanks are due to the author and to Starhaven for permission to reprint these poems.PoetryCarol Rumensguardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds feeds.guardian.co.uk |
Books of The Times: Pick Your Adjective: Talented, Secretive, Perverse Joan Schenkar’s biograpy of the author Patricia Highsmith takes an unconventional approach to telling the story of an unconventional woman. feeds.nytimes.com |
Paperback Row Paperback books of particular interest. feeds.nytimes.com |
A wing and a prayer Birds have always been endowed with symbolic portent – from Chekhov to Hitchcock to Twitter. We ignore their decline at our peril. There are glimmers of hope, but only if we act now urges Margaret AtwoodHow to justify the ways of men to birds? How to account for their attraction for us? (For, despite Hitchcock's frightening hunt-and-peck film, The Birds, it is mostly an attraction.) Why is Chekhov's play called "The Seagull" instead of "The Sea Slug"? Why is Yeats so keen on swans and hawks, instead of an interesting centipede or snail, or even an attractive moth? Why is it a dead albatross that is hung around the Ancient Mariner's neck as a symbol that he's been a very bad mariner, instead of, for instance, a dead clam? Why do we so immediately identify with such feathered symbols? These are some of the questions that trouble my waking hours.For as long as we human beings can remember, we've been looking up. Over our heads went the birds – free as we were not, singing as we tried to. We gave their wings to our deities, from Inanna to winged Hermes to the dove-shaped Holy Spirit of Christianity, and their songs to our angels. We believed the birds knew things we didn't, and this made sense to us, because only they had access to the panoramic picture – the ground we walked on, but seen widely because seen from above, a vantage point we came to call "the bird's eye view". The Norse god Odin had two ravens called Thought and Memory, who flew around the earth during the day and came back at evening to whisper into his ears everything they'd seen and heard; which was why – in the mode of governments with advanced snooping systems, or even of Google Earth – he was so very all-knowing.Some of us once believed that the birds could carry messages, and that if only we had the skill we'd be able to decipher them. Wasn't the invention of writing inspired, in China, by the flight of cranes? Thoth, the Egyptian god of scribes credited with the invention of hieroglyphic writing, had the head of an ibis. In the ancient world, an entire job category grew up around bird reading: that of augury, performed by seers and prophets who could interpret the winged signs. When Agamemnon and Menelaus were setting out for Troy, two eagles tore apart a pregnant hare and ate the unborn young. The augur's prediction was victory – Troy would fall – but an ill-omened victory with a heavy price to be paid; and so it turned out. "A bird of the air shall carry the voice," says Ecclesiastes, with impressive gravitas, "and those that have wings shall tell the truth"; and we can bet that those bird-borne truths were momentous.By the 1950s, when I was what's now called a young adult, respect for birds had dwindled considerably. Birds might still be thought to carry messages – "a little bird told me," we were fond of saying – but these messages were no longer from the gods, and they no longer concerned the deaths of kings and the fates of nations. They were more likely to be from the girl who had the locker next to yours, and to be about who just broke up with whom. "Bird-brained" meant stupid, and people with too obsessive a knowledge of birds were considered geeky and ridiculous. Bird-watching had become an increasingly popular pastime – a trend spurred by Roger Tory Peterson's 1934 publication of the first Field Guide to the Birds – but one of the effects of this growing popularity was the appearance of parody versions of such guides, filled with cartoons of silly-looking people in pith helmets with names like "The Spectacled Drone", who were watching girls in halter tops and short-shorts captioned "The Rosy-Breasted Nutcracker". There were also various puns on the slang word "bird", meaning either an attractive girl or – cf Frank Sinatra – the male genital organ. The supposed light-mindedness and frivolity of birdy activity is mirrored today in the name of the popular Twitter site, with "tweet" being the term for a tiny info-tidbit.But times change, and we're heading back towards an older way of reading the birds. It's Fates of Nations time again, and ill omens seen through birds in flight – or the absence of them - and deadly prices to be paid for getting what you want. The birds have something to tell us again, and the truths are not comfortable ones.❦I've always lived in the birdy world. I grew up in it – my parents were early conservationists and naturalists – and I can tell you from personal experience that small children have a limited tolerance for sitting still in canoes for hours on end being gnawed by mosquitoes, to see if the Very Rare Blur will deign to do a flit-by, when they won't see it anyway because they were making the more controllable ant crawl up their arms. But early training does sometimes bear fruit, and I reconnected with the bird world once everyone, including me, realised that I was nearsighted. I needed special help with the twirly thing on the top of the binoculars, at which point the Very Rare Blur resolved into something I could actually see.Birds of a feather flock together, so I eventually ended up with another bird-oriented person – Graeme Gibson, more recently the author of The Bedside Book of Birds and the chair of the board of the Pelee Island Bird Observatory. Sitting in a canoe being gnawed by mosquitoes while waiting for the Very Rare Blur is a lot better if you yourself are in charge of the timetable – as in, "Let's have lunch now" – so we did a lot of birdwatching. Graeme had the zeal of a recent convert, I displayed the nonchalance of the born denominationalist, but our shared pursuit took us to many unusual places in the world. Some of our sightings were not heroic – the distant never-before-glimpsed-by-human-eye prehistoric Mexican enigma turned out to be a brown pelican, the snowy owl was actually a white plastic milk bottle – or was it the other way around?Back in the 70s and 80s and then the 90s, however, you could depend on the birds to be more or less where they were supposed to be, more or less when they were supposed to be there. Failures to see them were bad luck or lack of skill on your part: the birds themselves were surely just around the corner. If not this time, then next; if not this year, then next. But all that is changing, and it's changing very rapidly. The suddenness of the decline – not only in threatened species, but in relatively abundant ones, such as the neotropical woodland warblers – is very worrying. No bird species can any longer be taken for granted.❦In February 2006, Graeme and I accepted the position of joint honourary presidents of the Rare Bird Club within BirdLife International. BirdLife describes itself as "a global partnership of conservation organisations working for the diversity of life through the conservation of birds and their habitats". Sometimes it subtitles itself "Working for birds and people". Under that broad umbrella, it supports an impressive number of activities carried on by its country partners all around the world – everything from running a Preventing Extinctions programme focused on birds at risk, to studying international migration flyways in order to remove thoughtlessly-built man-made hazards, to monitoring toxicity that kills birds fast and people more slowly. (A hint: if birds are dying in the water, don't swim there.) BirdLife's many projects are implemented on the ground through its country partners – over a hundred of them, and growing – but the secretariat that does much of the science and manages the overall network is located in Cambridge, and it has the same problem all conservation organisations have; it's easier to attract donations for individual projects than for overall management.The Rare Bird Club's task is to support the secretariat, and to fundraise for it. Graeme and I agreed to take this on, not because we had time on our hands – we didn't – but because we knew about the crisis in the life of birds, and also about the connection between a healthy ecosystem and a healthy human population. "Canary in the coal mine" – which comes from a time when miners knew that if their caged canaries toppled over it meant imminent asphyxiation for them – is not an empty phrase: where birds are dying now (through poisons, habitat destruction, and famine), people will die later. The die-off in seabirds, for instance, signals a die-off in sea life, including fish. It doesn't take a very smart augur to read that kind of bird omen.Three snapshots: two summers ago, we were with some Rare Bird Club members in the high Arctic. We were watching a polar bear finishing the remains of a seal, while nearby two all-white ivory gulls waited to pick over the bones. Everyone present knew that all the main elements of this scene – the feeding bear, the gull, the ice itself – might soon disappear from the earth like a mirage, as if they had never been. This could happen, not in centuries, but in years. It's was global warming, not as a theory, but in a very concrete form.Much further south, on an island off the coast of Georgia, we stood on a beach and watched a large flock of red knots – named originally for King Canute – feeding along the surf line. They were busily at work there, but we knew that further up the coast people were "harvesting" the horseshoe crabs that spawn on the beach, thus eliminating the crab eggs the birds depend on to sustain them during their long migration.Further south still, at the bottom of New Zealand's South Island, we went out one night to see kiwis – those flightless balls of feathery fur with long curved bills we first met, as children, on tins of shoe polish. Sometimes not a single kiwi is sighted on such trips. But we were favoured; we saw five: young, mature, male and female. None of these had fallen prey to those scourges of ground-dwelling New Zealand birds – the cats, the rats and the dogs – but many of their kindred had. All flightless and ground-nesting New Zealand birds are under threat. The carnage since the arrival of people on New Zealand has been brutal.That's the key: "Since the arrival of people." Most of the time, we don't kill birds on purpose. We kill them by accident, or at second-hand through our technologies, our pets, or our fellow-traveller pests.Here are a few statistics. In the United States, power lines kill 130 to 174 million birds a year – many of them raptors such as hawks, or waterfowl, whose large wingspans can touch two hot wires at a time, resulting in electrocution, or who smash into the thin power lines without seeing them (think piano wire). Cars and trucks collide with and kill between 60 and 80 million annually in the US, and tall buildings – especially those that leave their lights on all night – are a major hazard for migrating birds, leading to between a hundred million and a billion bird deaths annually. Add in lighted communication towers, which also kill large numbers of bats, and can account for as many as 30,000 bird deaths each on a bad night – thus 40 to 50 million deaths a year, and due to double as more towers are built. Agricultural pesticides directly kill 67 million birds per year, with many more deaths resulting from accumulated toxins that converge at the top of the food chain, and from starvation as the usual food of insectivores disappears. Cats polish off approximately 39 million birds in the state of Wisconsin alone; multiply that by the number of states in America, and then do the calculations for the rest of the world: the numbers are astronomical. Then there are the factory effluents, the oil spills and oil sands, the unknown chemical compounds we're pouring into the mix. Nature is prolific, but at such high kill rates it's not keeping up, and bird species – even formerly common ones – are plummeting all over the world.One more statistic: according to Al Gore, 97% of charitable giving goes to human causes. Of the remaining 3%, half goes to pets. That leaves 1½% devoted to the rest of nature – including the crisis-ridden oceans, the eroding, drying, or flooding land and the shrinking biosphere on which our lives depend. How crazy are we? We're a lot like those old cartoons in which the foolish character is sawing off the same tree branch he's sitting on, while beneath him is a sheer drop to nowhere. It makes you want to stick your head in the sand, like – apparently – almost everyone else, and just eat a lot, watch old movies from the time before things got so scary, and go shopping. Or, as James Lovelock keeps warning us: enjoy it while you can, whatever "it" is, because it's not going to last much longer.Despite such gloom – or perhaps because of it – there are many intrepid individuals and organisations out there, hurling themselves on to the tracks in the path of the speeding EcoDeath Express. There are international organisations, national ones, local ones; all are understaffed and overworked, like hospitals during pandemics. As I've said, my own connections are with BirdLife International; I attended its international convention in Argentina last September. These conventions happen only every four years, and they bring together the representatives of BirdLife's national partners from around the world. The energy and enthusiasm were contagious, and it was clear from just a few glances around that the days of the 50s stereotype of the harmless, nerdy Spectacled Drone was gone forever.Those now involved in bird conservation are serious and gutsy people – much more Seven Samurai than Jerry Lewis. They know their stuff, and the stuff they know can be pretty edgy. We heard tales of how the Ecuadorean organisation, Aves&Conservacion, had fought illegal habitat destruction and tree piracy with online posts, and when these generated death threats, it had posted the threats as well, until it had finally forced its government to act; of how the Maltese partner, BirdLife Malta, had finally stopped the devastating, and – in the EU – illegal spring bird hunt on this key migration island with the help of the European Commission, which had taken the island to court. There were death threats involved in that action, too, and car bombings as well; but with the support of more than 70% of the island's residents, the cause had finally been won. We heard about the compilation of the Guide to the Birds of Iraq, an enterprise that involved great danger for those doing the work. The conservation movement has its leaders and its foot soldiers, but also its martyrs: there have been human deaths as well as bird deaths.A large part of BirdLife's energies are directed towards mapping important bird areas and attempting to protect them, and in cataloguing rare birds and monitoring them. In this way, rare and endangered birds that live in such areas and never leave them can be saved. But what about migrating birds? They run the gauntlet: if every stopping point but one is made safe, it's the one unsafe point that will kill the species. This is where international networking can help.Consider the albatross. Nineteen of the 22 albatross species – the literary bird whose corpse was hung around the neck of the Ancient Mariner "instead of the cross," to symbolise a non-human sacrificial being – has been under threat for years from long-line and trawl fishing. The hooks – as many as 1,000 per line – are dragged along behind the boats, and the bait on them attracts fish, which in turn attract albatrosses, which then get snagged on the hooks. The fishermen don't mean to catch the albatrosses; in fact, it's a disadvantage to them. As for the albatross, the breeding cycle is very long and typically only one chick is reared at a time, so it's been very easy to kill more birds than can be replaced by the species themselves. Before 2005, hundreds of thousands were dying annually. The albatross is a circumpolar bird, living mostly at sea, so trying to monitor it and help it cannot be the work of any one country.In view of these difficulties, BirdLife established an international albatross task force in 2005 to work in seven countries, with a mandate to help both fishermen and birds. The task force placed specialised instructors on the fishing boats, to teach the simple, effective, and money-saving solutions – mere changes in fishing techniques – to the fishermen themselves. The result has been that thousands of albatrosses are now being saved. For instance, in the south Chile seas, the accidental capture of seabirds has been reduced from 1,500 a year to zero, with a close to zero rate having been achieved in Argentina. Despite these gains, 100,000 albatrosses are still being killed in fisheries every year, and 18 albatross species are facing extinction. But there's a glimmer of hope: the task force has shown that with a lot of will and with ridiculously small amounts of money, the death trend can be turned around. But it's a matter of time, and extinction is forever. Human beings, it seems, are like little children, who never do quite believe that "all gone" means there isn't any more, at all, ever.Still, "'Hope' is the thing with feathers," wrote Emily Dickinson. Too often, these days, it isn't. But in the case of the albatross, it is, if we're reading the bird signals right. Or at least it could be; which is the nature of hope.BirdsMargaret Atwoodguardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds feeds.guardian.co.uk |
Martin Amis suggesting euthanasia booths? It's all about his work | Michael White Martin Amis may be in a funk about growing old and publicity for his book, but the 'silver tsunami's' future is all about work, and perhaps he could be a lollipop man…What a treat! Martin Amis sounds off about the need for euthanasia booths for the elderly on every street corner on the very day that the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) tells the government that oldies like Martin should be able to carry on working way past 65 if they want to do so.Marty wants to if he can manage it.But in the Sunday Times interview that caused the latest ruckus (guess what, he's got a new novel, The Pregnant Widow, coming out) he's worrying about what he calls "the death of talent", the writer's other death."Novelists tend to go off at about 70 [he turned 60 last year] and I'm in a funk about it," he confesses.So you should be in a funk, dear. But it's all part of growing old gracefully, and there are bound to be useful things for you to do. The Times's account of the EHRC report today contains a cheerful vignette from a David Buckley.Made redundant at 60, he found new life as a call centre customer adviser and is still going strong at 73. No one has yet written a good call centre novel – a stint with the gas board might get Amis's juices going again.In fairness to Amis – let's be fair because he so often isn't – his remarks come towards the end of a lengthy interview in which he talks mostly about the things that interest him: himself, his books, sex, a familiar agenda, "breaking the rules, buggering about with the reader, drawing attention to himself" – as his old dad once put it.What got him going was the painful death last year of his stepfather, Alastair (Lord) Kilmarnock, whom his mother married long ago after Kingsley Amis ran off when young Martin was 12."He thought he was going to get better, but he didn't. I think the denial of death is a great curse. We all wanted to assist him … it was clearly a lost battle," he explains.Well, yes. We can all follow that. Most of us know people who are old and frail, cared for by people not much younger.But "assisting him", that's tricky, as the Dignitas debate constantly reminds everyone. So does the case of Frances Inglis, the Essex woman convicted last week of murdering her brain-damaged 22-year-old son with a lethal heroin dose. Brave or cruel? The debate's not going to go away because so many more people are living to a ripe old age, over-ripe in some cases where the mind or body fails."Medical science has again over-vaulted itself," says Amis, who denies getting as grumpy and reactionary as his father but sometimes manages a pretty good imitation.I think Marty was probably just teasing, or showing off to demonstrate his literary ability to shock, perhaps also to offset the shortness which evidently so bothers him ("the bit of his body Keith hated was the bit that wasn't there"), as it does Nicolas Sarkozy, another compulsive show-off.It will draw predictably hostile fire (Terry Eagleton, where are you?) as it did when Marty suggested that "the Muslim community will have to suffer until it gets its house in order" and went on to suggest a few helpful ways that it might. Deportations? Strip-searching? Restrictions on travel?Much of this has come to pass. At the time I defended the little monster on the grounds that Islam is having an unusual amount trouble coming to terms with modernity, a crisis which has been around a long time – since the days when the Ottomans (with respect to Professor Eagleton's anti-imperalist critique) were a pretty imperial power themselves.Amis has since half-retracted by refining his loathing on to Islamism rather than Islam, many of whose adherents must dislike the hate-mongers as much as the rest of us. Good; it's a more defensible position, certainly more polite, perhaps expediently less honest.This time round, he's shooting even more wildly from the hip. It ought to be possible to ease people's passage into eternity, and doctors often do it, don't they?But you have to watch doctors, just as you do nurses, carers and progressives, who are historically quite keen to dispatch those who get in the way of progress, as evaluated by them.Oh really? Yes. Dennis Sewell's new book, The Political Gene, outlines the history of the eugenics movement since Darwin's great theory of evolution moved into the social and political sphere.Apart from justifying the excesses of "survival of the fittest" economics – we're getting a replay in the bankers' bonus drama – it let to a sustained drive to curb the breeding habits of the (perceived) poor and feckless by abortion, sterilisation and – not just in Hitler and Stalin's camps – something worse.Who was it who used the term "lethal chambers" to help tackle the problem, and did so as early as 1912? Not young Adolf struggling to become an artist in prewar Vienna. No, it was George Bernard Shaw, then one of the intellectual avant garde, lionised in London society.It won't come to that; we're much more sensitive than we were, though some of those Muslim pronouncements on the need to exterminate Israel remain a bit 19th century, awaiting re-education from wiser and kinder teachers than Martin Amis.Some of the answer to Amis's worries lie in medical science and the elusive cure for Alzheimer's and other forms of senility. But much of it lies in lifestyle, in physical and mental activity, in better eating and the rest.For many people work will be part of their new regime, already is for David Buckley and 1.3 million other Britons, though it may not be full-time or even doing what they used to do. The economics point that way too: if we're going to live longer someone has to pay for it and that someone should be us, not our kids.So the EHRC is more right than wrong. Look out for Martin Amis, stooped and white-haired but kindly community lollipop man in Primrose Hill. He'll be repaying his debt to society in a useful way, but also keeping his mind sharp ("watch out, kiddies") in case his muse decides to strike one last time after all.WelfareMartin AmisOlder peopleAgeingGeneticsSocial careAssisted suicideIslamMichael Whiteguardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds feeds.guardian.co.uk |